Difference between revisions of "Team L"
(→Gustavo and Daniel) |
|||
(7 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | |||
== Members == | == Members == | ||
Line 29: | Line 28: | ||
Score: 0.6382 | Score: 0.6382 | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | We first tried cutting some parallelograms and noticed that sharp edges created more stress. We added circles (thus the bone looking images) to lower the stresses. We then noticed that an elongated ellipse allowed us to remove more matter without creating a great amount of stress. The shape of the circle and the ellipse were the "best" shapes used, since their smooth or non-existant angles did not allow much stress to build. | ||
=== Gustavo and Daniel === | === Gustavo and Daniel === | ||
Line 43: | Line 46: | ||
Score: 0.1256 | Score: 0.1256 | ||
+ | |||
+ | Following Professor Cheever's advice on rounding edges to minimize the concentration of stress, we started off by double-filleting the inward cuts of the template design. We then ran a test to determine areas with little stress and extruded circles and elipses in those areas. We also planned to fillet the edges of those circles. | ||
== Final Design == | == Final Design == | ||
=== Model and Score === | === Model and Score === | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | + | [[File:Final Design Team L.jpg]] | |
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | Mass: 0.97 | ||
+ | |||
+ | Displacement: 0.1279 | ||
+ | |||
+ | Score: 0.124063 or 0.12 (2SF) | ||
+ | |||
+ | === How we got there === | ||
+ | |||
+ | When we compared the results, we noticed that Gustavo and Daniel's model had much less stress on it. We played around with shapes but both groups agreed to maintain an ellipse in the center. We then tried to remove more mass but that only increased the displacement level. We thus decided to maintain this shape and this mass that offered a favourable result. |
Latest revision as of 02:24, 27 September 2012
Contents
Members
First Designs
Helen and Raundi
Design Score
Mass: 1.06
Displacement: 0.6021
Score: 0.6382
We first tried cutting some parallelograms and noticed that sharp edges created more stress. We added circles (thus the bone looking images) to lower the stresses. We then noticed that an elongated ellipse allowed us to remove more matter without creating a great amount of stress. The shape of the circle and the ellipse were the "best" shapes used, since their smooth or non-existant angles did not allow much stress to build.
Gustavo and Daniel
Design Score
Mass: 0.99
Displacement: 0.1269
Score: 0.1256
Following Professor Cheever's advice on rounding edges to minimize the concentration of stress, we started off by double-filleting the inward cuts of the template design. We then ran a test to determine areas with little stress and extruded circles and elipses in those areas. We also planned to fillet the edges of those circles.
Final Design
Model and Score
Mass: 0.97
Displacement: 0.1279
Score: 0.124063 or 0.12 (2SF)
How we got there
When we compared the results, we noticed that Gustavo and Daniel's model had much less stress on it. We played around with shapes but both groups agreed to maintain an ellipse in the center. We then tried to remove more mass but that only increased the displacement level. We thus decided to maintain this shape and this mass that offered a favourable result.