Difference between revisions of "Stereotype threat"

From Diversifying Economic Quality: A Wiki for Instructors and Departments

Jump to: navigation, search
(What Economists Have to Say about Stereotype Threat)
 
(15 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
'''Stereotype threat''' occurs when an individual is at risk of confirming a negative stereotype about his or her own group. The individual may not perform according to his or her true ability; rather, performance can be adversely impacted by concern about generally held beliefs regarding this individual's grouping, whether it is by sex, age, gender, race, etc. [http://www.reducingstereotypethreat.org/definition.html  Click Here] to learn more.   
+
'''Stereotype threat''' is a psychological mechanism in which a person's performance is inhibited by prevalent stereotypes about a group to which the person belongs. This threat occurs when an individual is at risk of confirming a negative stereotype about his or her own group. The individual may not perform according to his or her true ability; rather, concerns about confirming generally held beliefs regarding this individual's grouping (e.g., sex, age, gender, race, etc.) cause him or her to under-perform.  [http://www.reducingstereotypethreat.org/definition.html  Click Here] to learn more.   
 
 
__NOTOC__
 
__NOTOC__
 
== Evidence of Stereotype Threat ==
 
== Evidence of Stereotype Threat ==
 
 
'''[http://www.reducingstereotypethreat.org/bibliography_steele_aronson.html Steele & Aronson (1995)]''' found that "Black college freshmen and sophomores performed more poorly on standardized tests than White students when their race was emphasized. When race was not emphasized, however, Black students performed better and equivalently with White students. The results showed that performance in academic contexts can be harmed by the awareness that one's behavior might be viewed through the lens of racial stereotypes."   
 
'''[http://www.reducingstereotypethreat.org/bibliography_steele_aronson.html Steele & Aronson (1995)]''' found that "Black college freshmen and sophomores performed more poorly on standardized tests than White students when their race was emphasized. When race was not emphasized, however, Black students performed better and equivalently with White students. The results showed that performance in academic contexts can be harmed by the awareness that one's behavior might be viewed through the lens of racial stereotypes."   
  
'''[http://www.reducingstereotypethreat.org/bibliography_aronson_fried_good.html Aronson, Fried, & Good (2002)]''' showed that "encouraging students to see intelligence as malleable (i.e., embrace an incremental theory of intelligence) can raise enjoyment and performance in academic contexts."   
+
'''[http://course1.winona.edu/CFried/documents/stthreat.pdf Aronson, Fried, & Good (2002)]''' produced evidence that "encouraging students to see intelligence as malleable (i.e., embrace an incremental theory of intelligence) can raise enjoyment and performance in academic contexts."  In their experiment, college students in the treatment group learned an incremental theory of intelligence and wrote a letter explaining the theory to a low-performing middle school pen pal.  "The African American students (and, to some degree, the White students) encouraged to view intelligence as malleable reported greater enjoyment of the academic process, greater academic engagement, and obtained higher grade point averages than their counterparts in two control groups."
  
 
'''[http://www.reducingstereotypethreat.org/bibliography_ambady_paik_steele_owen-smith_mitchell.html Ambady, Paik, Steele, Owen-Smith, & Mitchell (2004)]''' showed that "individuation (priming an individual to recall her distinct interests and abilities) can serve as a buffer against stereotype threat, perhaps because it allows a means for individuals to distance the self from identities linked to the stereotype in question."  
 
'''[http://www.reducingstereotypethreat.org/bibliography_ambady_paik_steele_owen-smith_mitchell.html Ambady, Paik, Steele, Owen-Smith, & Mitchell (2004)]''' showed that "individuation (priming an individual to recall her distinct interests and abilities) can serve as a buffer against stereotype threat, perhaps because it allows a means for individuals to distance the self from identities linked to the stereotype in question."  
  
 
Click [http://www.reducingstereotypethreat.org/bibliography.html  here] for a more complete listing of studies that document the existence, mediation, and moderation of stereotype threat.
 
Click [http://www.reducingstereotypethreat.org/bibliography.html  here] for a more complete listing of studies that document the existence, mediation, and moderation of stereotype threat.
 
== How to Reduce Stereotype Threat ==
 
  
 
  [[File:Stereotype threat.jpg|right]]
 
  [[File:Stereotype threat.jpg|right]]
  
*Reframing the task
+
== How to Reduce Stereotype Threat ==
 
+
   
*Deemphasizing threatened social identities
 
 
 
*Encouraging self-affirmation
 
 
 
*Emphasizing high standards with assurances of capability
 
 
 
*Providing role models
 
 
 
*Providing external attributions for difficulty
 
 
 
*Emphasizing an incremental view of ability
 
 
 
[http://www.reducingstereotypethreat.org/reduce.html Click Here] for details in how to implement the above solutions.
 
 
 
  
 +
* [[biology is not destiny|Foster a growth mindset]] in your students.
 +
 +
*Reframe the task.
  
 +
*Deemphasize threatened social identities.
  
 +
*Encourage [[values affirmation]].
  
 +
*Provide [[wise criticism]], emphasizing high standards with assurances of capability.
  
 +
*Provide [ftp://ftp1.economics.smu.edu/WorkingPapers/2017/SERRA/SERRA-2017-05.pdf role models].
  
 +
*Provide external attributions for difficulty.
 +
 +
* Read about more [https://ed.stanford.edu/sites/default/files/interventionshandout.pdf Empirically Validated Strategies to Reduce Stereotype Threat].
  
 +
[http://www.reducingstereotypethreat.org/reduce.html  Click Here] to go to www.ReducingStereotypeThreat.org for details on how to implement the above solutions.
  
 
== What Economists Have to Say about Stereotype Threat ==
 
== What Economists Have to Say about Stereotype Threat ==
Line 44: Line 37:
 
Christina Günther (MPI of Economics, Evolutionary Economics Group), Neslihan Arslan Ekincib, Christiane Schwieren (University of Heidelberg, Department of Economics AWI), and Martin Strobel (Universiteit Maastricht, Department of Economics) conducted [http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/505559/description#description experiments] supporting a stereotype threat explanation for the wage gap between men and women. "Women tend not to compete with men in areas where they (rightly or wrongly) think that they will lose anyway – and the same holds for men."    Their findings can be linked to the performance of women in the economics classroom. Since the field of economics is perceived as a "male" field, women may underperform or be discouraged from the field due to the perception that they do not belong.  
 
Christina Günther (MPI of Economics, Evolutionary Economics Group), Neslihan Arslan Ekincib, Christiane Schwieren (University of Heidelberg, Department of Economics AWI), and Martin Strobel (Universiteit Maastricht, Department of Economics) conducted [http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/505559/description#description experiments] supporting a stereotype threat explanation for the wage gap between men and women. "Women tend not to compete with men in areas where they (rightly or wrongly) think that they will lose anyway – and the same holds for men."    Their findings can be linked to the performance of women in the economics classroom. Since the field of economics is perceived as a "male" field, women may underperform or be discouraged from the field due to the perception that they do not belong.  
  
 +
In [http://www.nber.org/papers/w14705.pdf "Stereotype Threat and the Student-Athlete"] (NBER Working Papers: 14705, 2009), Thomas S. Dee "presents an economic model of stereotype threat [as well as] empirical evidence from a laboratory experiment in which students at a selective college were randomly assigned to a treatment that primed their awareness of a stereotyped identity (i.e., student-athlete). This treatment reduced the test-score performance of athletes relative to non-athletes by 14 percent (effect size = -1.0)."
  
In "Stereotype Threat and the Student-Athlete" (NBER Working Papers: 14705, 2009), Thomas S. Dee "presents an economic model of stereotype threat [as well as] empirical evidence from a laboratory experiment in which students at a selective college were randomly assigned to a treatment that primed their awareness of a stereotyped identity (i.e., student-athlete). This treatment reduced the test-score performance of athletes relative to non-athletes by 14 percent (effect size = -1.0)." [http://www.nber.org/papers/w14705.pdf]
+
There is very little literature from economists concerning stereotype threat itself, let alone stereotype threat in the classroom.  As of May 2012, only ten publications show up in an Econlit search for "stereotype threat." Psychologists have explored this topic extensively, but the majority of research looks at the general implications of academic stereotypes of racial minorities and the implications in STEM of gender stereotypes. Very little research has examined the incidence of stereotype threat within the field of Economics.
 
 
 
 
There is very little literature from economists concerning stereotype threat itself, let alone stereotype threat in the classroom.  Only 9 publications show up in an Econlit search for "stereotype threat." There are findings yet to be discovered concerning this topic.
 
  
 
==Conclusion==
 
==Conclusion==
 
In order to create a more inclusive classroom environment, economics professors should be aware of stereotype threat and its potential effects upon students. To explore more information concerning stereotype threat, please go to this [http://www.reducingstereotypethreat.org/  website]
 
In order to create a more inclusive classroom environment, economics professors should be aware of stereotype threat and its potential effects upon students. To explore more information concerning stereotype threat, please go to this [http://www.reducingstereotypethreat.org/  website]
 
  
  
 
{{hidden|Sources|
 
{{hidden|Sources|
 
Stroessner, Steven, and Catherine Good. ReducingStereotypeThreat.org. Consortium of High Achievement and Success (CHAS) and Barnard College. Web. 11 July 2011. <http://www.reducingstereotypethreat.org/>.}}
 
Stroessner, Steven, and Catherine Good. ReducingStereotypeThreat.org. Consortium of High Achievement and Success (CHAS) and Barnard College. Web. 11 July 2011. <http://www.reducingstereotypethreat.org/>.}}

Latest revision as of 12:41, 4 June 2019

Stereotype threat is a psychological mechanism in which a person's performance is inhibited by prevalent stereotypes about a group to which the person belongs. This threat occurs when an individual is at risk of confirming a negative stereotype about his or her own group. The individual may not perform according to his or her true ability; rather, concerns about confirming generally held beliefs regarding this individual's grouping (e.g., sex, age, gender, race, etc.) cause him or her to under-perform. Click Here to learn more.

Evidence of Stereotype Threat

Steele & Aronson (1995) found that "Black college freshmen and sophomores performed more poorly on standardized tests than White students when their race was emphasized. When race was not emphasized, however, Black students performed better and equivalently with White students. The results showed that performance in academic contexts can be harmed by the awareness that one's behavior might be viewed through the lens of racial stereotypes."

Aronson, Fried, & Good (2002) produced evidence that "encouraging students to see intelligence as malleable (i.e., embrace an incremental theory of intelligence) can raise enjoyment and performance in academic contexts." In their experiment, college students in the treatment group learned an incremental theory of intelligence and wrote a letter explaining the theory to a low-performing middle school pen pal. "The African American students (and, to some degree, the White students) encouraged to view intelligence as malleable reported greater enjoyment of the academic process, greater academic engagement, and obtained higher grade point averages than their counterparts in two control groups."

Ambady, Paik, Steele, Owen-Smith, & Mitchell (2004) showed that "individuation (priming an individual to recall her distinct interests and abilities) can serve as a buffer against stereotype threat, perhaps because it allows a means for individuals to distance the self from identities linked to the stereotype in question."

Click here for a more complete listing of studies that document the existence, mediation, and moderation of stereotype threat.

Stereotype threat.jpg

How to Reduce Stereotype Threat

  • Reframe the task.
  • Deemphasize threatened social identities.
  • Provide wise criticism, emphasizing high standards with assurances of capability.
  • Provide external attributions for difficulty.

Click Here to go to www.ReducingStereotypeThreat.org for details on how to implement the above solutions.

What Economists Have to Say about Stereotype Threat

Christina Günther (MPI of Economics, Evolutionary Economics Group), Neslihan Arslan Ekincib, Christiane Schwieren (University of Heidelberg, Department of Economics AWI), and Martin Strobel (Universiteit Maastricht, Department of Economics) conducted experiments supporting a stereotype threat explanation for the wage gap between men and women. "Women tend not to compete with men in areas where they (rightly or wrongly) think that they will lose anyway – and the same holds for men." Their findings can be linked to the performance of women in the economics classroom. Since the field of economics is perceived as a "male" field, women may underperform or be discouraged from the field due to the perception that they do not belong.

In "Stereotype Threat and the Student-Athlete" (NBER Working Papers: 14705, 2009), Thomas S. Dee "presents an economic model of stereotype threat [as well as] empirical evidence from a laboratory experiment in which students at a selective college were randomly assigned to a treatment that primed their awareness of a stereotyped identity (i.e., student-athlete). This treatment reduced the test-score performance of athletes relative to non-athletes by 14 percent (effect size = -1.0)."

There is very little literature from economists concerning stereotype threat itself, let alone stereotype threat in the classroom. As of May 2012, only ten publications show up in an Econlit search for "stereotype threat." Psychologists have explored this topic extensively, but the majority of research looks at the general implications of academic stereotypes of racial minorities and the implications in STEM of gender stereotypes. Very little research has examined the incidence of stereotype threat within the field of Economics.

Conclusion

In order to create a more inclusive classroom environment, economics professors should be aware of stereotype threat and its potential effects upon students. To explore more information concerning stereotype threat, please go to this website