Chamorro/Disambiguation - Revision history

Ltarlin1 at 00:52, 14 May 2017

2017-05-14T00:52:55Z

Ltarlin1: /* Code */

2017-05-12T05:18:49Z

‎Code

Ltarlin1: /* Code */

2017-05-12T05:18:36Z

‎Code

Ltarlin1 at 05:17, 12 May 2017

2017-05-12T05:17:26Z

Ltarlin1 at 02:56, 12 May 2017

2017-05-12T02:56:57Z

Ltarlin1 at 02:44, 12 May 2017

2017-05-12T02:44:21Z

Ltarlin1: Created page with "boop Category:Sp17 Disambiguation"

2017-05-12T00:17:57Z

Created page with "boop Category:Sp17 Disambiguation"

New page

boop

[[Category:Sp17 Disambiguation]]

@@ Line 11: / Line 11: @@
 * Hu liʼeʼ i dánkolo na taotao (I saw the big person)
-In the first sentence, the word serves as a noun because there is no other noun later in the sentence. However, in the second sentence, the noun 'taotao (person)' is present, making 'dánkolo' into an adjective. I believe that in any sentence of the form of the second sentence, the noun that the adjective modifies will be exactly two words away. Therefore, the constraint that I will use is that every time that a noun is two words after the adjective/noun ambiguous word, the transducer should select the adjective analysis of the word.
+In the first sentence, the word serves as a noun because there is no other noun later in the sentence. However, in the second sentence, the noun 'taotao (person)' is present, making 'dánkolo' into an adjective. I believe that in any sentence of the form of the second sentence, the noun that the adjective modifies will be exactly two words away. Therefore, the constraint that I will use is that every time that a noun is two words after the adjective/noun ambiguous word, the transducer should select the adjective analysis of the word. Conversely, whenever this context does not appear, I will force the transducer to default to the noun reading.
 == Final Evaluation of Ambiguity ==
-Final ambiguity is 1.344 (2030 analyses of 1510 tokens).
+Final ambiguity is 1.344 (2029 analyses of 1510 tokens).
-* This makes sense because the disambiguation rule I wrote focused specifically on a single construction that did not appear at all in my original corpus. The only reason that both new sentences were not analyzed correctly was that I could not figure out how to make it default to the noun unless the sentence fit the specified environment.
+* This makes sense because the disambiguation rule I wrote focused specifically on a single construction that did not appear at all in my original corpus. Therefore, the only two sentences with ambiguities removed were the two that I added to test whether the rules were working.
 [[Category:Sp17 Disambiguation]]

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 == Code ==
-[https://github.swarthmore.edu/ltarlin1/ling073-cha Code]
+[https://github.swarthmore.edu/ltarlin1/ling073-cha Link to Github page]
 == Initial Evaluation of Ambiguity ==

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:18, 12 May 2017
Line 1:		Line 1:
	== Code ==		== Code ==
		+	[https://github.swarthmore.edu/ltarlin1/ling073-cha Code]

	== Initial Evaluation of Ambiguity ==		== Initial Evaluation of Ambiguity ==

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 == Initial Evaluation of Ambiguity ==
-Initial ambiguity is 1.338 (2005 analyses of 1498 tokens).
+Initial ambiguity is 1.345 (2031 analyses of 1510 tokens).
-* Many of the ambiguous forms are pronouns. The way the transducer works at this moment, I gave every pronoun the ability to be analyzed in any person and number. I wasn't sure if this was the best way to go about it, but it does cause a lot of multiple analyses in this disambiguation phase.
+* Many of the ambiguous forms are pronouns. The way the transducer works at this moment, I gave every pronoun the ability to be analyzed in any person and number. I wasn't sure if this was the best way to go about it, but it does cause a lot of multiple analyses in this disambiguation phase. Also, this initial evaluation includes the two sentences (listed below) that I added to the corpus to test the disambiguator so that the size of the corpus would be constant before and after this step.
 == Example ==
@@ Line 9: / Line 11: @@
 In the first sentence, the word serves as a noun because there is no other noun later in the sentence. However, in the second sentence, the noun 'taotao (person)' is present, making 'dánkolo' into an adjective. I believe that in any sentence of the form of the second sentence, the noun that the adjective modifies will be exactly two words away. Therefore, the constraint that I will use is that every time that a noun is two words after the adjective/noun ambiguous word, the transducer should select the adjective analysis of the word.
 [[Category:Sp17 Disambiguation]]

@@ Line 2: / Line 2: @@
 Initial ambiguity is 1.338 (2005 analyses of 1498 tokens).
 * Many of the ambiguous forms are pronouns. The way the transducer works at this moment, I gave every pronoun the ability to be analyzed in any person and number. I wasn't sure if this was the best way to go about it, but it does cause a lot of multiple analyses in this disambiguation phase.
 [[Category:Sp17 Disambiguation]]

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:44, 12 May 2017
Line 1:		Line 1:
−	~~boop~~	+	== Initial Evaluation of Ambiguity ==
		+	Initial ambiguity is 1.338 (2005 analyses of 1498 tokens).
		+	* Many of the ambiguous forms are pronouns. The way the transducer works at this moment, I gave every pronoun the ability to be analyzed in any person and number. I wasn't sure if this was the best way to go about it, but it does cause a lot of multiple analyses in this disambiguation phase.

	[[Category:Sp17 Disambiguation]]		[[Category:Sp17 Disambiguation]]