Difference between revisions of "Navajo and English/Lexical selection"

From LING073
Jump to: navigation, search
(→‎Example 2: Man)
(→‎Example 3: Han)
Line 40: Line 40:
 
* [Particle used on discovering something: ‘oh yes, I see]  -> Man ngayqan
 
* [Particle used on discovering something: ‘oh yes, I see]  -> Man ngayqan
  
−
===Example 3: Han===
+
===Example 3: ===
  
 
{| class="wikitable"
 
{| class="wikitable"
 
|-
 
|-
−
! Waray Sentence !! English Translation
+
! Navajo Sentence !! English Translation
 
|-
 
|-
−
| Kun asya man itu, makúkúhaq ku na it báduq han Lúnis? || In that case, can I get the dress on Monday.
+
| ? || .
 
|-
 
|-
−
| Ay, didtu ak kan balay han akun sangkay. || Oh, I was at my friend’s house.
+
| . || .
 
|}
 
|}
  
 
* On, at [with days of the week] -> Han
 
* On, at [with days of the week] -> Han
 
* At, on [past time] -> Han
 
* At, on [past time] -> Han

Revision as of 18:54, 4 May 2022

Nav -> Eng

Example 1:

Navajo English Translation
. .
.  ?
. .
. .
. .
  • Again -> na liwat
  • Rather [adj.] -> liwat
  • Just because [so–and–so]/is the case [predicate] happens -> bákay kay...liwat
  • However, on the other hand -> liwat
  • [Particle dismissing something as not worth worrying about: ‘anyway’] -> liwat

Example 2:

Navajo Sentence English Translation
. .
 ?  ?
. .
  • Since, because -> Man
  • [Particle used when the speaker is pointing out something] -> Man
  • [Particle used on discovering something: ‘oh yes, I see] -> Man ngayqan

Example 3:

Navajo Sentence English Translation
 ? .
. .
  • On, at [with days of the week] -> Han
  • At, on [past time] -> Han