Difference between revisions of "Wôpanâak/Transducer"
(→Evaluation) |
|||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
==Notes== | ==Notes== | ||
This analyzer currently analyzes nouns. As of yet, it can properly analyze nouns for possession, number, animacy, and whether the noun is absentative, obviative, or locative. (All these analyses are based on Baird's grammar.) Not too many nouns have been entered into the lexicon yet, and in particular few nouns with truncating stems. At the moment, some of these overgenerate due to the presence of an archiphoneme, while others are sent through special lexicons to get the material before any suffixes. | This analyzer currently analyzes nouns. As of yet, it can properly analyze nouns for possession, number, animacy, and whether the noun is absentative, obviative, or locative. (All these analyses are based on Baird's grammar.) Not too many nouns have been entered into the lexicon yet, and in particular few nouns with truncating stems. At the moment, some of these overgenerate due to the presence of an archiphoneme, while others are sent through special lexicons to get the material before any suffixes. | ||
| + | |||
| + | The corpus has many issues, the largest of which being that for much of the text orthography is not standardized. The analysis successes all come from sentences taken from the grammar. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Initial corpus coverage was 10.59%. Adding "waskeetôp<n><aa><sg>" and "seepȣ<n><nn><sg>", and fixing "mahkus" so that its stem inflected as reflected in the corpus, improved coverage to 15.44%. | ||
Revision as of 22:09, 17 February 2017
Evaluation
Corpus Coverage
Note: the corpus has many issues, the largest of which being that for much of the text orthography is not standardized. The analysis successes all come from sentences taken from the grammar.
Initial corpus coverage was 10.59%.
Notes
This analyzer currently analyzes nouns. As of yet, it can properly analyze nouns for possession, number, animacy, and whether the noun is absentative, obviative, or locative. (All these analyses are based on Baird's grammar.) Not too many nouns have been entered into the lexicon yet, and in particular few nouns with truncating stems. At the moment, some of these overgenerate due to the presence of an archiphoneme, while others are sent through special lexicons to get the material before any suffixes.
The corpus has many issues, the largest of which being that for much of the text orthography is not standardized. The analysis successes all come from sentences taken from the grammar.
Initial corpus coverage was 10.59%. Adding "waskeetôp<n><aa><sg>" and "seepȣ<n><nn><sg>", and fixing "mahkus" so that its stem inflected as reflected in the corpus, improved coverage to 15.44%.
