Difference between revisions of "Kaingang/Universal Dependencies"
(→Dependency) |
(→Dependency) |
||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
(for each relation: a description of the relation, noting various ways it might be used in the language; and two examples of the relation from your corpus, preferably illustrating what you described.) | (for each relation: a description of the relation, noting various ways it might be used in the language; and two examples of the relation from your corpus, preferably illustrating what you described.) | ||
===Five dependency relations that we used at least twice in our annotation=== | ===Five dependency relations that we used at least twice in our annotation=== | ||
| − | ==== | + | ====CASE==== |
| − | ==== | + | ====NSUBJ==== |
We used the NSUBJ relation to relate subjects to non-verbal predicates. Where Portuguese and English use a copula "to be" verb, Kaingang instead uses a particular aspect marker "vẽ". | We used the NSUBJ relation to relate subjects to non-verbal predicates. Where Portuguese and English use a copula "to be" verb, Kaingang instead uses a particular aspect marker "vẽ". | ||
| Line 40: | Line 40: | ||
In the above example, we would connect the nonverbal predicate ''fi'' with its NSUBJ dependent ''mỹnh''. | In the above example, we would connect the nonverbal predicate ''fi'' with its NSUBJ dependent ''mỹnh''. | ||
| − | ==== | + | ====ADVMOD==== |
| − | ==== | + | ====NMOD:POSS==== |
| − | ==== | + | ====OBJ==== |
[[Category: sp19_UD]] [[Category: Kaingang]] | [[Category: sp19_UD]] [[Category: Kaingang]] | ||
Revision as of 00:59, 1 May 2019
kgp.annotated2.ud.conllu and kgp.annotated2.nomorph.conllu are the files we chose to train the parser on (not kgp.annotated.ud.conllu or kgp.annotated.nomorph.conllu).
Contents
Evaluation
Number of forms, UAS, LAS scores for kgp.annotated2.ud.conllu
$ udpipe --accuracy --parse kgp.withmorph.udpipe ../kgp.annotated2.ud.conllu Loading UDPipe model: done. Parsing from gold tokenization with gold tags - forms: 160, UAS: 70.62%, LAS: 55.00%
- Number of sentences in corpus: 18
Number of forms, UAS, LAS scores for kgp.annotated2.nomorph.conllu
$ udpipe --accuracy --parse kgp.nomorph.udpipe ../kgp.annotated2.nomorph.conllu Loading UDPipe model: done. Parsing from gold tokenization with gold tags - forms: 160, UAS: 70.62%, LAS: 55.00%
- Number of sentences in corpus: 18
Dependency
(for each relation: a description of the relation, noting various ways it might be used in the language; and two examples of the relation from your corpus, preferably illustrating what you described.)
Five dependency relations that we used at least twice in our annotation
CASE
NSUBJ
We used the NSUBJ relation to relate subjects to non-verbal predicates. Where Portuguese and English use a copula "to be" verb, Kaingang instead uses a particular aspect marker "vẽ".
"Ka fej kusũg vẽ."
tree flower red ASP
"The tree's flower is red"
In the above example, we would connect the nonverbal predicate kusũg to its NSUBJ dependent fej.
"Inh mỹnh fi vẽ."
my mother her ASP
"She is my mother" (lit: my mother is her)
In the above example, we would connect the nonverbal predicate fi with its NSUBJ dependent mỹnh.
