Difference between revisions of "Mixe/Grammar"
(→Main parts of speech) |
(→Sets of alternations or systems (grammar points)) |
||
| Line 45: | Line 45: | ||
== Sets of alternations or systems (grammar points) == | == Sets of alternations or systems (grammar points) == | ||
| + | |||
| + | === Nouns === | ||
=== Verbs === | === Verbs === | ||
Revision as of 19:09, 1 March 2022
Useful resources
- mto-Spanish vocabulary
- mto Phonotagemics
- paper / mto text and interlinear glosses
- paper on orthography - some examples; useful for "translating" between various texts, ipa, etc
- Master's thesis on applicative constructions
Main parts of speech
- determiners and demonstratives
- Demonstratives can function both as pronouns and as noun modifiers (ie. determiners). When determiners, they are reduced to a single CV syllable.
- jä<det><def> ↔ jä (the, those)
- xii<dem> ↔ xi (that)
- xii<prn> ↔ xii (that)
- yë'ë<dem> ↔ yë (these)
- yë'ë<prn> ↔ yë'ë (these)
- ja'a<dem> ↔ ja (that (distant))
- ja'a<prn> ↔ ja'a (that (distant))
- verbs
- nouns
- Nouns are divided into three classes: simple, derived, and compound.
- xëk<n> ↔ xëk (bean)
- 'ök<n> ↔ 'ök (dog)
- kumöön<n> ↔ kumööntömpä (citizen)
- jäyu<n> ↔ jäyu (person)
- limösnä<n> ↔ limösnä (alms) (very likely a Spanish loan)
- adjectives
- Adjectives can occur before or after the noun phrase they modify. When they precede the NP, they are unmarked. When they occur after the NP, they are part of a relative clause introduced by the relativizer juu'<rlt> ↔ juu'. Number isn't marked on adjectives, nor is aspect. Adjectives can also be reduplicated to express intensity.
- poo'p<adj> ↔ poo'p (white)
- mu'uk<adj> ↔ mu'uk (wild)
- aspectual proclitics
- të<pro><perf> ↔ të
- kë<pro><cfct> ↔ kë
- aspectual enclitics
- nä<enc> ↔ nä
- nu<enc> ↔ nu
- tä<enc> ↔ tä
- äni<enc> ↔ äni
- m<enc> ↔ m
- auxiliaries
- kä'ä<aux> ↔ kä'ä (negative auxiliary)
- xip<adj> ↔ xip (in there)
- yëk<n><pl> ↔ yëk-käätä (black bulls)
- numerals
- post-positions
Sets of alternations or systems (grammar points)
Nouns
Verbs
A couple things here. First of all, POS tags need to come firsts, then subcategory, then grammatical tags. Secondly, tag names should be kept short, ideally within 3 or 4 characters if possible. You don't need to say whether something is obligatory or not, as that's a morphotactic thing and not a syntactic thing. Also, if there are multiple properties you want to mark, separate them into separate tags. -JNW
Verbs are generally of the form: person.prefix - stem - time/aspect.suffix p.303. Like other Mixe-Zoquean languages, mto verbs are characterized as independent or dependent, which we respectively tag <idt> and <dep>. (Note that the Apertium tag <ind> marks indefiniteness, not independence.)
Still not sure if all verbs must be independent or dependent, or if a verb can be neither or unspecified.
- näjcx<v><idt><p2> ↔ mnäjcxp (you are going)
- vaꞌan<v><p3><fut> ↔ vyaꞌanüt (he/she will say/tell)
There are 20 possible morpheme positions for any given verb. These morphemes mark and include aspect/mood, person, negation, modals, intensifiers, valence-changers, the verb stem, adverbial, plural, inverse, still/also, completive vs incompletive vs irrealis, dependent vs independent, and aspectual enclitics (an enclitic is something like n't in English). Apertium has tense/aspect tags, but none that seem to line up with the aspects used in mto. So, we tag nonobligatory aspect morphology <asp> (for now, but I haven't yet determined whether we need to tag this). <o_sg1> is a standard Apertium tag, denoting second person singular object. <a_sg1> is first person singular agent. <its> denotes intensifier morphology. < ins > is instrumental. <inv> is inverse. <cpl> is completive aspect. <icpl> is incompletive aspect. <lex> is a lexical affix (e.g MOUTH). <apl> is applicative. <irr> is irrealis mood. <inc> is inceptive. <des> is desiderative.
- näjcx<v><p3><pl><decisive><asp><fut> ↔ ñäjcxtinuvat (they also will go)
- vop<v><o_sg2><dep><its><ins><inv><pl><asp><cpl> ↔ mtuntukvojpjitinï (they already hit you a lot with)
- jöy<v><o_sg2><idt><its><its><ins><lex><apl><prs><inv><pl><irr><idt> ↔ mjää’ktuntuk’äjöyävääjnjïtup (wants to buy it from you once again)
- kots<v><tv><a_sg1><idt><neg><its><apl><icpl><idt> ↔ nkätunkojtsjip ((people say) I really don't give advice to)
- kotsnäx<v><tv><a_sg3><idt><inc><des><icpl><idt> ↔ kyotsnäx’ukvä’änuväämp (he/she wants to start talking)
Verbal morphology is mostly agglutinative, but some morphemes fuse, likely for phonological reasons.
- E.G 'y-' (p3) + 'näjcx' (go) = 'ñäjcx'
- ñäjcx<v><p3> ↔ he/she goes
- NOTE: my current understanding is that ñäjcx can't stand alone. That is, it requires further morphemes to be grammatical.
Base verb forms
mto verbs fall into two categories: invariable and variable. Invariable verbs have regular base forms that don't change when they co-occur with other morphemes. Variable verbs, however, are irregular and do change depending on surrounding morphemes. Specifically, their forms may be dependent on morphology expressing inverse, aspect, mode, and valence-changing.
- nöm<v> ↔ run
- nöm<v><imp> ↔ nöm
- nöm<v>{<irr><idt> ↔ nöm
- nöm<v><irr><dep> ↔ nöm
- nöm<v><imp> ↔ nömï (run!)
- nöm<v><cpl><idt> ↔ nööm
- nöm<v><icpl><idt> ↔ nööm
- nöm<v><p2><idt><icpl_idt_iv> ↔ mnöömp (you run)
- nöm<v><p2><idt><cpl><idt> ↔ mnööm (you ran)
- nöm<v><icpl><dep> ↔ num
- nöm<v><cpl><dep> ↔ nujm
- pat<v> ↔ go up
- pat<v><imp> ↔ pat
- pat<v><irr><idt> ↔ pat
- pat<v><irr><dep> ↔ pat
- pat<v><imp> ↔ pajt
- pat<v><irr><idt> ↔ pajt
- pat<v><irr><dep> ↔ pajt
- pat<v><icpl><dep> ↔ pet
- pat<v><cpl><dep> ↔ pejt
- 'oo'k<v> ↔ die
- 'oo'k<v><imp> ↔ 'oo'k
- 'oo'k<v><cpl><idt> ↔ 'oo'k
- 'oo'k<v><icpl><idt> ↔ 'oo'k
- 'oo'k<v><irr><idt> ↔ 'oo'k
- 'oo'k<v><irr><dep> ↔ 'oo'k
- 'oo'k<v><cpl><dep> ↔ 'ëë'k
- 'oo'k<v><icpl><dep> ↔ 'ëë'k
Person markers and tense/aspect markers depend on transitivity, whether it's in the "conjunctive" or "disjunctive" mode, and (for transitive verbs) whether a subject or object is being referred to.
not yet sure what the difference b/w the 2 modes are. In fact, might just replace this w something closer to Guzman's explanation -Elizabeth
| Basic verb morphology (p307) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mode | Person | Intransitive | Transitive | ||
| Subject indicated | Object indicated | ||||
| Conjunctive | 1 | n- | n- | x- | |
| 2 | m- | x- | m- -jü | ||
| 3 | y- | tü- | y- -jü | ||
| Disjunctive | 1 | #- | n- | x- | |
| 2 | m- | m- | m- -jü | ||
| 3 | #- | y- | #- -jü | ||
Mto is an inversely hierarchical language, meaning that a verb can't agree with more than one argument at a time, regardless of transitivity. An intransitive verb agrees with its subject. A transitive verb agrees with whichever of its arguments is highest on the following hierarchy of person features: 1st>2nd>3rd(proximate)>3rd(obviative) (Gúzman, 35). When a verb has more than one 3rd-person referent, the more salient is called proximate, and the less salient obviative.
Transitivity
Verbs are intransitive by default. They are transitivized with a person-indicating prefix. [p.304]
| Transitive form | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Verb | Translation | Person indicator | |||
| n'ixp äts | 'I'm watching (something)' | n- | |||
| m'ixp mits | 'you're watching (something)' | m- | |||
| y-ixp jë'ë | 'he/she is watching (something)' | y- | |||
| Intransitive form | |||||
| ixp äts | 'I'm watching' | none | |||
| m'ixp mits | 'you're watching' | m- | |||
| ixp jë'ë | 'he/she is watching' | none | |||
Other verb morphology (probably most useful for transducer stuff)
Need to add explanations for independent vs dependent constructions and inverse constructions and completive vs incompletive
When surface and underlying form differ, the underlying form is indicated like so: /form/.
Morphology for intransitive verbs (lack of <tv> = intransitive)
May need to change order of some of the tags, depending on whether they matter syntactically.
- Imperative verbs
- Imperative <imp>: -ï
- nöm<v><imp> ↔ nömï run!
- pat<v><imp> ↔ patï rise!
- nëjkx<v><imp> ↔ nëjkxï go!
- Imperative <imp>: -ï
- Verbs in independent constructions
- Incompletive <idt><icpl>: -p
- nöm<v><idt><icpl><p2> ↔ mnöömp you run/you're running
- pat<v><idt><icpl><p2> ↔ mpajtp you rise/you're rising
- nëjkx<v><idt><icpl><p2> ↔ mnëjkxp you go/you're going
- Completive <idt><cpl>: /-W/ → Ø
- nöm<v><idt><cpl><p2> ↔ mnööm you ran
- pat<v><idt><cpl><p2> ↔ mpajt you rose
- nëjkx<v><idt><cpl><p2> ↔ mnëjkx you went
- Irrealis <idt><irr>: -up
- nöm<v><idt><irr><p2> ↔ mnömup you will run
- pat<v><idt><irr><p2> ↔ mpatup you will rise
- nëjkx<v><idt><irr><p2> ↔ mnëjkxup you will go
- Incompletive <idt><icpl>: -p
- Verbs in dependent constructions
- Incompletive <dep><icpl>: /-I/ → Ø (construction: kä'ä=m_) -I seems to sometimes show up phonetically, but generally doesn't. I haven't yet figured out how to predict when it will or won't be pronounced. Guzman notes that she uses uppercase letters for reconstructed morphemes. Might be that this is a silent morpheme that affects surrounding morphology. Or maybe it's better analyzed as a fusional feature. I.e. to form a dependent, incompletive, intransitive verb form, you don't add a <tv><dep><inc> morpheme; rather, the verb stem itself "changes" to reflects this.)
- nöm<v><dep><icpl><p2> ↔ mnum you (don't) run/you're (not) running
- pat<v><dep><icpl><p2> ↔ mpet you (don't) rise/you're (not) rising
- nëjkx<v><dep><icpl><p2> ↔ mnïjkx you (don't) go/you're (not) going
- Completive <dep><cpl>: /-jI/ → Ø
- nöm<v><dep><cpl><p2> ↔ mnujm you didn't run
- pat<v><dep><cpl><p2> ↔ mpejt you didn't rise
- nëjkx<v><dep><cpl><p2> ↔ mnïjkx you didn't go
- Irrealis <dep><irr>: -ït
- nöm<v><dep><irr><p2> ↔ mnömït you will not run
- pat<v><dep><irr><p2> ↔ mpatït you will not rise
- nëjkx<v><dep><irr><p2> ↔ mnëjkxït you will not go
- Incompletive <dep><icpl>: /-I/ → Ø (construction: kä'ä=m_) -I seems to sometimes show up phonetically, but generally doesn't. I haven't yet figured out how to predict when it will or won't be pronounced. Guzman notes that she uses uppercase letters for reconstructed morphemes. Might be that this is a silent morpheme that affects surrounding morphology. Or maybe it's better analyzed as a fusional feature. I.e. to form a dependent, incompletive, intransitive verb form, you don't add a <tv><dep><inc> morpheme; rather, the verb stem itself "changes" to reflects this.)
Morphology for transitive verbs <tv>
Should I tag transitive verbs <v><tv> or just <tv>?
- Imperative <tv><imp>: -ï
- pää't<v><tv><imp> ↔ pää'tï find it!
- këë'ts<v><tv><imp> ↔ këë'tsï break it!
- pöx<v><tv><imp> ↔ pöxï cut it!
- Independent constructions
- Incompletive <tv><idt><icpl>: /-py/ → -p
- pää't<v><tv><idt><icpl><a_p2> ↔ mpäätyp you find it
- këë'ts<v><tv><idt><icpl><a_p2> ↔ mkïï'tsp you break it
- pöx<v><tv><idt><icpl><a_p2> ↔ mpujxp you cut it
- Inverse <tv><idt><icpl><inv>: /-ju-py/ → -jup
- pää't<v><tv><idt><icpl><inv><o_p2> ↔ mpäätjup (he) finds you
- Applicative + inverse <tv><idt><icpl><inv><apl>: /-ïx-ju-py/ → -ïx-jup
- pää't<v><tv><idt><icpl><inv><apl><o_p2> ↔ mpäätïxjup (he) finds (it) for you
- Completive <tv><idt><cpl>: /-W/ → Ø
- pää't<v><tv><idt><cpl><a_p2> ↔ mpäät you found it
- Inverse <tv><idt><cpl><inv>: /-ju-W/ → -ju
- pää't<v><tv><idt><cpl><inv><o_p2> ↔ mpäätju (he) found you
- Applicative + inverse <tv><idt><cpl><inv><apl>: /-ïx-ju-W/ → -ïx-ju
- pää't<v><tv><idt><cpl><inv><apl> ↔ mpäätïxju (he) found (it) for you
- Irrealis <tv><idt><irr>: -up
- pää't<v><tv><idt><irr><a_p2> ↔ mpää'tup you'll find it
- Inverse <tv><idt><irr><inv>: /-ju-up/ → -jup
- pää't<v><tv> ↔ mpää'tjup (he) will find you
- Applicative + inverse <tv><idt><irr><inv><apl>: /ïx-ju-up/ → -ïx-jup
- pää't<v><tv><idt><irr><inv><apl><o_p2> ↔ mpää'tïxjup (he) will find (it) for you
- Incompletive <tv><idt><icpl>: /-py/ → -p
- Dependent constructions
- Incompletive <tv><dep><icpl>: /-I/ → Ø
- pää't<v><tv><dep><icpl><a_p2> ↔ xpää'ty (he) does (not) find you
- Inverse <tv><dep><icpl><inv>: /ju-I/ >> -jï
- pää't<v><tv><dep><icpl><inv><o_p2> ↔ mpää'tyjï (he) does (not) find you
- Applicative + inverse <tv><dep><icpl><inv><apl>: /ïx-ju-I/ → -ïx-jï
- pää't<v><tv><dep><icpl><inv><apl><o_p2> ↔ mpää'tïxjï (he) does (not) find (it) for you
- Completive <tv><dep><cpl>: /-jI/ → Ø
- pää't<v><tv><dep><cpl><a_p2> ↔ xpääty you did (not) find it
- Inverse <tv><dep><cpl><inv>: /-ju-jI/ → -ji
- pää't<v><tv><dep><cpl><inv><o_p2> ↔ mpäätji (he) did (not) find you
- Applicative + inverse <tv><dep><cpl><inv><apl>: /ïx-ju-jI/ → -ïx-ji
- pää't<v><tv><dep><cpl><inv><apl><o_p2> ↔ mpäätïxji (he) did (not) find (it) for you
- Irrealis <tv><dep><irr>: -ït
- pää't<v><tv><dep><irr><a_p2> ↔ xpää'tït you will (not) find (it)
- Inverse <tv><dep><irr><inv>: /-ju-ït/ → -jït
- pää't<v><tv><dep><irr><inv><o_p2> ↔ mpää'tjït (he) will (not) find you
- Applicative + inverse <tv><dep><irr><inv><apl>: /ïx-ju-ït/ → -ïx-jït
- pää't<v><tv><dep><irr><inv><apl><o_p2> ↔ mpää'tïxjït (he) will (not) find (it) for you,
- Incompletive <tv><dep><icpl>: /-I/ → Ø