Difference between revisions of "Uyghur and English/Contrastive Grammar"
From LING073
(→Sentence Structure) |
(→Sentence Structure) |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
Examples: | Examples: | ||
* {{transferTest|uig|eng| .خۇدا يورۇقلۇقنىڭ ياخشى ئىكەنلىكىنى كۆردى|God saw that light was good.}} | * {{transferTest|uig|eng| .خۇدا يورۇقلۇقنىڭ ياخشى ئىكەنلىكىنى كۆردى|God saw that light was good.}} | ||
| − | *: {{transferMorphTest|uig|eng|{{tag|n}}{{tag|nom}}+ يورۇقلۇق{{tag|n}}{{tag|gen}}+ ياخشى{{tag|adj}}+ | + | *: {{transferMorphTest|uig|eng|{{tag|n}}{{tag|nom}} + يورۇقلۇق{{tag|n}}{{tag|gen}}+ ياخشى{{tag|adj}}+ ئىكەنلىكىنى{{tag|...?}} كۆردى{{tag|ifi}}{{tag|...?}}|God {{tag|n}}{{tag|p3}}+ saw{{tag|v}}{{tag|ifi}}+ that{{tag|rel}}+ light{{tag|n}}{{tag|sg}}+ was{{tag|v}}{{tag|ifi}}+ good{{tag|adj}}}} |
==Noun== | ==Noun== | ||
Revision as of 16:12, 15 April 2025
This wiki-page is created to document instances of grammar difference between some sentences in Uyghur and English.
Sentence Structure
General English sentences would follow S + V + obj, whereas in Uyghur, it would be S + obj + V.
Examples:
- (uig) .خۇدا يورۇقلۇقنىڭ ياخشى ئىكەنلىكىنى كۆردى → (eng) God saw that light was good.
- (uig) <n><nom> + يورۇقلۇق<n><gen>+ ياخشى<adj>+ ئىكەنلىكىنى<...?> كۆردى<ifi><...?> → (eng) God <n><p3>+ saw<v><ifi>+ that<rel>+ light<n><sg>+ was<v><ifi>+ good<adj>
Noun
Uyghur has 10 different cases for each specific noun whereas English does not have any. Examples:
Pronoun
In Uyghur, notice that:
- Second-Person Pronouns are categorized based on the formality
- The Third-Person Pronoun are not categorized according to gender or number.
In English, both of these cases are the opposite.
Examples:
Verb to be
In English, the verb "to be" is used; whereas in Uyghur, it is often omitted. Examples:
Verbs
The verbs are categorized according to the pronouns. Since the Pronouns are already different between the two languages, this leads to many cases that leads to a difference in the tags for the verb in each tense. Examples:
