Difference between revisions of "Okinawan/Universal Dependencies"
From LING073
(→Discourse) |
|||
| Line 38: | Line 38: | ||
== Dependency relations == | == Dependency relations == | ||
| − | == | + | === discourse === |
Since the corpora that I used for this assignment were from the "Pear story", there were a '''lot''' of discourse markers. I tried to connect them to the root (unless it was prohibitively far away). | Since the corpora that I used for this assignment were from the "Pear story", there were a '''lot''' of discourse markers. I tried to connect them to the root (unless it was prohibitively far away). | ||
| Line 69: | Line 69: | ||
</pre> | </pre> | ||
| − | == advmod == | + | === advmod === |
Because Okinawan hides so much meaning in case markers, much of the semantics of the language are somewhat invisible in UD land. The advmod tag acted as a bit of a catchall for words that modified verbs. | Because Okinawan hides so much meaning in case markers, much of the semantics of the language are somewhat invisible in UD land. The advmod tag acted as a bit of a catchall for words that modified verbs. | ||
| Line 97: | Line 97: | ||
<pre> | <pre> | ||
| − | == obj == | + | === obj === |
Most of the sentences that I used involved transitive verbs, so I used the obj tag for the (usually) nominals that were their objects. | Most of the sentences that I used involved transitive verbs, so I used the obj tag for the (usually) nominals that were their objects. | ||
| Line 120: | Line 120: | ||
</pre> | </pre> | ||
| − | == conj == | + | === conj === |
I wasn't super confident about this one, but I generally attached this to non-auxiliary verbs that I did not deem to be the root. | I wasn't super confident about this one, but I generally attached this to non-auxiliary verbs that I did not deem to be the root. | ||
| Line 157: | Line 157: | ||
</pre> | </pre> | ||
| − | == amod == | + | === amod === |
Pretty much what's written on the tin. Most of the time, this attached to adjectives, but sometimes it would be used on a noun that was not suited to be `case`. | Pretty much what's written on the tin. Most of the time, this attached to adjectives, but sometimes it would be used on a noun that was not suited to be `case`. | ||
| Line 200: | Line 200: | ||
"<.>" | "<.>" | ||
"." sent @punct #5->1 | "." sent @punct #5->1 | ||
| + | </pre> | ||
| + | |||
| + | === cop === | ||
| + | |||
| + | The `cop` tag was well suited to Okinawan, as the language actually distinguishes between the copula and verb "to be" (similarly to Japanese). This often connected to its nominal. | ||
| + | |||
| + | <pre> | ||
| + | "<いきがぬ>" | ||
| + | "いきが" n gen @root #1->0 | ||
| + | "<うをぅちゅる>" | ||
| + | "うをぅちゅ" n emp @amod #2->1 | ||
| + | "<やらはじろ>" | ||
| + | "や" cop cvb amb dsc @cop #3->1 | ||
| + | "<うれ>" | ||
| + | "うれ" prn dem @det #4->1 | ||
| + | "<.>" | ||
| + | "." sent @punct #5->1 | ||
| + | </pre> | ||
| + | <pre> | ||
| + | |||
| + | "<なあ>" | ||
| + | "なあ" dsc @discourse #1->6 | ||
| + | "<とぅすいが>" | ||
| + | "とぅすい" n nom @amod #2->6 | ||
| + | "<やら>" | ||
| + | "やら" cop cvb @cop #3->2 | ||
| + | "<また>" | ||
| + | "また" dsc @discourse #4->6 | ||
| + | "<わかある>" | ||
| + | "わかさん" adj vz npst @amod #5->6 | ||
| + | "<ちゅが>" | ||
| + | "ちゅ" n nom @obj #6->8 | ||
| + | "<やら>" | ||
| + | "や" cvb @cop #7->5 | ||
| + | "<わからにが>" | ||
| + | "わかるん" v neg cvb nom @root #8->0 | ||
| + | "<きいぬ>" | ||
| + | "きい" n nom @obj #9->11 | ||
| + | "<いいし>" | ||
| + | "いい" adj all @advmod #10->11 | ||
| + | "<ぬぶやあくん>" | ||
| + | "ぬぶいん" v prog @conj #11->8 | ||
| + | "<ばあよ>" | ||
| + | "ばあよ" dsc @discourse #12->11 | ||
| + | "<.>" | ||
| + | "." sent @punct #13->11 | ||
</pre> | </pre> | ||
[[Category:Sp17_UD]] | [[Category:Sp17_UD]] | ||
Latest revision as of 09:11, 15 May 2017
Eval
(Formatting borrowed from Darbus.)
| withmorph | nomorph | |||||
| LAS | UAS | LAS | UAS | Forms | Sentences | |
| annotated | 51.30% | 63.48% | 23.48% | 36.52% | 115 | 15 |
| annotated2 | 42.37% | 62.71% | 44.07% | 67.80% | 59 | 11 |
Dependency relations
discourse
Since the corpora that I used for this assignment were from the "Pear story", there were a lot of discourse markers. I tried to connect them to the root (unless it was prohibitively far away).
"<いっけえらさぐとぅ>" "いっけえるん" v cnd @conj #1->5 "<な>" "な" dsc @discourse #2->5 "<るうん>" "るう" prn foc @nsubj #3->5 "<あり>" "あり" dsc @discourse #4->5 "<すいへや>" "すん" v cvb @root #5->0 "<.>" "." sent @punct #6->5
"<ちいちなち>" "ちいち" n dsc hs @obj #1->3 "<とぅらち>" "とぅらちゅん" v med @aux #2->3 "<きてぃんじゃん>" "きいん" v cvb prog @root #3->0 "<ばあよ>" "ばあよ" dsc @discourse #4->3 "<.>" "." sent @punct #5->3
advmod
Because Okinawan hides so much meaning in case markers, much of the semantics of the language are somewhat invisible in UD land. The advmod tag acted as a bit of a catchall for words that modified verbs.
"<あんちゃぐとぅ>" "あんちゃぐとぅ" dsc @discourse #1->3 "<うま>" "うま" prn dem abs @advmod #2->3 "<とぅまとぅん>" "とぅむん" v prog @root #3->0 "<ばあよ>" "ばあよ" dsc @discourse #4->3 "<.>" "." sent @punct #5->3
"<まあしが>" "まあ" intadv all foc @advmod #1->2 "<むたてぃんじゅる>" "むたりいん" v cvb imp @ccomp #2->3 "<わからん>" "わかるん" v neg @root #3->0 "<ばあよ>" "ばあよ" dsc @discourse #4->3 "<.>" "." sent @punct #5->3
=== obj === Most of the sentences that I used involved transitive verbs, so I used the obj tag for the (usually) nominals that were their objects. <pre> "<すぐ>" "すぐ" dsc @discourse #1->5 "<なあ>" "なあ" dsc @discourse #2->5 "<あり>" "あり" dsc @discourse #3->5 "<じてんしゃ>" "じてんしゃ" n abs @obj #4->5 "<ぬてぃきし>" "ぬいん" v cvb prog med @root #5->0 "<ぼおし>" "ぼおし" n abs @obj #6->7 "<かんてぃ>" "かんとぅん" v cvb @conj #7->5 "<.>" "." sent @punct #8->5
conj
I wasn't super confident about this one, but I generally attached this to non-auxiliary verbs that I did not deem to be the root.
"<いっけえらさぐとぅ>" "いっけえるん" v cnd @conj #1->5 "<な>" "な" dsc @discourse #2->5 "<るうん>" "るう" prn foc @nsubj #3->5 "<あり>" "あり" dsc @discourse #4->5 "<すいへや>" "すん" v cvb @root #5->0 "<.>" "." sent @punct #6->5
"<すぐ>" "すぐ" dsc @discourse #1->5 "<なあ>" "なあ" dsc @discourse #2->5 "<あり>" "あり" dsc @discourse #3->5 "<じてんしゃ>" "じてんしゃ" n abs @obj #4->5 "<ぬてぃきし>" "ぬいん" v cvb prog med @root #5->0 "<ぼおし>" "ぼおし" n abs @obj #6->7 "<かんてぃ>" "かんとぅん" v cvb @conj #7->5 "<.>" "." sent @punct #8->5
amod
Pretty much what's written on the tin. Most of the time, this attached to adjectives, but sometimes it would be used on a noun that was not suited to be `case`.
"<なあ>" "なあ" dsc @discourse #1->6 "<とぅすいが>" "とぅすい" n nom @amod #2->6 "<やら>" "やら" cop cvb @cop #3->2 "<また>" "また" dsc @discourse #4->6 "<わかある>" "わかさん" adj vz npst @amod #5->6 "<ちゅが>" "ちゅ" n nom @obj #6->8 "<やら>" "や" cvb @cop #7->5 "<わからにが>" "わかるん" v neg cvb nom @root #8->0 "<きいぬ>" "きい" n nom @obj #9->11 "<いいし>" "いい" adj all @advmod #10->11 "<ぬぶやあくん>" "ぬぶいん" v prog @conj #11->8 "<ばあよ>" "ばあよ" dsc @discourse #12->11 "<.>" "." sent @punct #13->11
"<いきがぬ>" "いきが" n gen @root #1->0 "<うをぅちゅる>" "うをぅちゅ" n emp @amod #2->1 "<やらはじろ>" "や" cop cvb amb dsc @cop #3->1 "<うれ>" "うれ" prn dem @det #4->1 "<.>" "." sent @punct #5->1
cop
The `cop` tag was well suited to Okinawan, as the language actually distinguishes between the copula and verb "to be" (similarly to Japanese). This often connected to its nominal.
"<いきがぬ>" "いきが" n gen @root #1->0 "<うをぅちゅる>" "うをぅちゅ" n emp @amod #2->1 "<やらはじろ>" "や" cop cvb amb dsc @cop #3->1 "<うれ>" "うれ" prn dem @det #4->1 "<.>" "." sent @punct #5->1
"<なあ>" "なあ" dsc @discourse #1->6 "<とぅすいが>" "とぅすい" n nom @amod #2->6 "<やら>" "やら" cop cvb @cop #3->2 "<また>" "また" dsc @discourse #4->6 "<わかある>" "わかさん" adj vz npst @amod #5->6 "<ちゅが>" "ちゅ" n nom @obj #6->8 "<やら>" "や" cvb @cop #7->5 "<わからにが>" "わかるん" v neg cvb nom @root #8->0 "<きいぬ>" "きい" n nom @obj #9->11 "<いいし>" "いい" adj all @advmod #10->11 "<ぬぶやあくん>" "ぬぶいん" v prog @conj #11->8 "<ばあよ>" "ばあよ" dsc @discourse #12->11 "<.>" "." sent @punct #13->11
