Difference between revisions of "Western Abenaki/Disambiguator"

From LING073
Jump to: navigation, search
(→‎Final Ambiguity)
(→‎Disambiguation Rule)
Line 28: Line 28:
  
 
{{morphTest|mil{{tag|v}}{{tag|pri}}{{tag|tv}}{{tag|aa}}{{tag|s_pl1_excl}}{{tag|o_3sg_def_aa}}|n'milȣnana}}
 
{{morphTest|mil{{tag|v}}{{tag|pri}}{{tag|tv}}{{tag|aa}}{{tag|s_pl1_excl}}{{tag|o_3sg_def_aa}}|n'milȣnana}}
−
 
  
 
==Final Ambiguity==
 
==Final Ambiguity==

Revision as of 19:18, 8 April 2023

Initial Ambiguity

The First Council Fire

Coverage: 293 tokens, or 12.62%

Ambiguity: 1.14


Masta

Coverage: 175 tokens, or 3.42%

Ambiguity: 1.10


Kimzowi Awikhigan

Coverage: 221 tokens, or 9.50%

Ambiguity: 1.21


Disambiguation Rule

Our rule disambiguated between two possible verb forms: the first person plural (inclusive or exclusive) with a definite animate object vs a definite inanimate object. See tags below:

mil<v><pri><tv><aa><s_pl1_excl><o_3sg_def_nn> ↔ n'milȣnana

vs

mil<v><pri><tv><aa><s_pl1_excl><o_3sg_def_aa> ↔ n'milȣnana

Final Ambiguity

The First Council Fire

Ambiguity: 1.14

Masta

Ambiguity: 1.10

Kimzowi Awikhigan

Ambiguity: 1.21

Examples

If we take the example above, this would be the difference between giving us all someone and giving us all something, which can be a very important semantic difference. The same ambiguity is seen in other tenses, such as the plural 2nd and plural 3rd.