Difference between revisions of "User:Mlohate1/Language selection"
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
Shan: | Shan: | ||
Shan, a relative of Thai I think is analytic. This is because many of the words are monosyllabic and have few pre or suffix's. Further, since its related to Thai, Thai is also an analytical language and I think that is a basis to say with good likelihood that Shan is Analytical. | Shan, a relative of Thai I think is analytic. This is because many of the words are monosyllabic and have few pre or suffix's. Further, since its related to Thai, Thai is also an analytical language and I think that is a basis to say with good likelihood that Shan is Analytical. | ||
| − | A dictionary can be found | + | A dictionary can be found [[ https://www.alibris.com/Shan-and-English-Dictionary-Josiah-Nelson-1840-1905-Cushing/book/6043657? here]] |
and there exists some Buddhists text located [[https://www.burmalibrary.org/en/category/buddhist-texts-and-commentaries-in-shan?__cf_chl_tk=YL0I6LrncYCc3le_E97mM1fU3N8ijQmDBQx1.nlGemc-1674163659-0-gaNycGzNCFE here]] | and there exists some Buddhists text located [[https://www.burmalibrary.org/en/category/buddhist-texts-and-commentaries-in-shan?__cf_chl_tk=YL0I6LrncYCc3le_E97mM1fU3N8ijQmDBQx1.nlGemc-1674163659-0-gaNycGzNCFE here]] | ||
Pontic Greek: | Pontic Greek: | ||
| − | I am not sure what this language exactly is because I identified that prefix and suffixes exist but am not sure to what extent they exist in. However, comparing Pontic Greek to Greek, then Ancient Greek is Fusional and that supports the minor evidence I have for the prefix's and suffix's. Regarding texts, I think finding texts may be hard, I have found some initial data on the alphabet but have yet to find full texts: https://omniglot.com/writing/pontic.htm | + | I am not sure what this language exactly is because I identified that prefix and suffixes exist but am not sure to what extent they exist in. However, comparing Pontic Greek to Greek, then Ancient Greek is Fusional and that supports the minor evidence I have for the prefix's and suffix's. Regarding texts, I think finding texts may be hard, I have found some initial data on the alphabet but have yet to find full texts: [[https://omniglot.com/writing/pontic.htm |
| − | + | alphabet data]] | |
Balinese: | Balinese: | ||
I think Balinese is analytical, this is because it has words similar to English and Latin and there are a lot of singular elements that construct into sentences. | I think Balinese is analytical, this is because it has words similar to English and Latin and there are a lot of singular elements that construct into sentences. | ||
| − | Some bible text: https://find.bible/languages/ban/ | + | Some bible text: [[https://find.bible/languages/ban/ bible]] |
Revision as of 21:29, 19 January 2023
Bua
Shah, Pontic Greek or Balinese.
Shan: Shan, a relative of Thai I think is analytic. This is because many of the words are monosyllabic and have few pre or suffix's. Further, since its related to Thai, Thai is also an analytical language and I think that is a basis to say with good likelihood that Shan is Analytical. A dictionary can be found https://www.alibris.com/Shan-and-English-Dictionary-Josiah-Nelson-1840-1905-Cushing/book/6043657? here and there exists some Buddhists text located [here]
Pontic Greek:
I am not sure what this language exactly is because I identified that prefix and suffixes exist but am not sure to what extent they exist in. However, comparing Pontic Greek to Greek, then Ancient Greek is Fusional and that supports the minor evidence I have for the prefix's and suffix's. Regarding texts, I think finding texts may be hard, I have found some initial data on the alphabet but have yet to find full texts: [[https://omniglot.com/writing/pontic.htm
alphabet data]]
Balinese: I think Balinese is analytical, this is because it has words similar to English and Latin and there are a lot of singular elements that construct into sentences. Some bible text: [bible]
